Hey Y'all,

What's up? I've been trying to get another job application out (meaning re-working my resume & job letter). Did I mention that I hate writing job letters?

Did you see the new studies about the RFK assassination? The official story of his killing is, if you can believe it, even more unbelievable than the official story of the assassination of his brother JFK. For years it's been known that the official autopsy of RFK stated that the bullets entered RFK from behind, including on at point blank range behind his ear, while every eye witness puts the so-called assassin Sirhan Sirhan 2-5 feet in front of RFK!

Another glaring problem from the official story is that although Sirhan Sirhan's revolver only holds 8 bullets and he did not re-load (he was tackled almost immediately after RFK was shot) , it appears that more than 8 bullets were fired (from bullet holes in the room and bullet wounds to bystanders) even though the police concluded that no other person fired a weapon other than Sirhan Sirhan.

The new studies are conformation's of these long standing problems in the official story. The studies are part of a new book by lawyer/former municipal judge/past President of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences and a dude who is an expert in the forensic study of audio recordings. The lawyer/forensic science guy looks at the autopsy report & concludes the shots have to have come from behind RFK - nothing new - but the exciting part if the study of a newly discovered audio recording of the assassination. A freelance reporter unknowingly made a recording of the assassination that was recently discovered & put through new high-tech analyses that argue for 10+ shots during the assassination, including several that were fired so close together that they could not have been fired from the same gun.

If you're interested, here are some more detailed articles on the assassination.

Anyhooters, not much exciting is going on. We might go bowling this weekend.